A Lawyer and His Wiener Doge Must Be Separated, Phantom Argues in Meme Coin Lawsuit

Maybe you love Wiener Doge. You can live for Wiener Doge. But you can’t create a Wiener Doge and then represent a group of plaintiffs in a lawsuit focused on the alleged stealing the Wiener Doge – that is, at least, according to the new legal submission.

In April, the creator of the Solana Meme coin called Wiener Doge (ever heard of him?) He sued the popular Crypto wallet with Phantom, claim This disadvantage in the design of wallets brought directly to the theft of token worth over $ 500,000. Now, Phantom’s lawyers are hitting, claiming this week that the creator of Wiener Doge, Liam Murphy, cannot serve as the only prosecutor’s lawyer in that case.

“Murphy throws himself as a unique protagonist in the story of his lawsuit – programmer, victim, litigation and court lawyer, all in one,” Phantom’s lawyers wrote UAA proposal disqualify a lawyer as a lawyer on Monday. “This convergence role will inevitably reduce every phase of this litigation.”

In New York, where the lawsuit was filed, the rules generally prohibit the practice of a lawyer to take cases where they will probably be “witnesses on a significant fact” unless key exceptions apply.

When he reaches Decipher For a comment on Wednesday, Murphy claimed to be such an exception make Log in in this case. A lawyer coin programmer said his fellow prosecutors were family members, including his mom, brother, girlfriend and stepfather, who were all talented Wiener Doge Tokens, and could not afford to retain specialized cryptocurrencies.

So, Murphy claims that if he was launched by the case, his family members had to reject the lawsuit and make that experience of “significant difficulty”-an elevator from the reign of New York about lawyers.

“Phantom’s proposal to disqualify me because the counselor will not go anywhere,” Murphy said Decipher. “Prejudice [the plaintiffs] Losing me as his advisor far outweighs any hypothetical prejudice towards the opponent. “

Phantom’s lawyers also claimed this week that Murphy’s motifs and his clients do not necessarily have to be aligned. Lawyers claimed, for example, that “one of the main questions in this litigation will be whether it will be Murphy who have not taken some security precautions in maintaining Wiener Doge and their own decisions that have led to the theft of hundreds of thousands of dollars worth meme coin.

At some point, lawyers said, other prosecutors Wiener Doge may want to hold Murphy responsible for their financial losses.

“Murphy can by no means represent their interests as a lawyer, and at the same time he is interested in defending himself from potential claims that his clients might want to endure against him,” Phantom’s lawyers said.

“My testimony will not in any way be harmful to my clients,” Murphy said on Wednesday, trying to overthrow such arguments.

The case is currently in front of the US District Court for southern New York district, Manhattan. In the complaint of the lawsuit, Murphy claims that Phantom, a dominant salt wallet worth over $ 3 billion, is irregularly stored by user’s private keys to the “non -haired browser memory” easily obtained through malicious software. Phantom has strongly refused these claims.

Murphy spent years working in some of the best corporate law firm in New York, where he represented crypto clients, including CelsiusA digital property lender that crashed in a spectacular manner in 2022. Earlier this year, the lawyer set his own cryptocurrency focused on shingles: Murphy’s law.