Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Followed by a guest post and an opinion from Michael Egorov, Founder Curve Finance.
As it defines the edges closer to the main financing of the mainstream, it must balance neutrality, safety and permeability. In 2025, this balance is increasingly defined by two competitive architectural visions.
Development Defense He has always hung on one basic question: What infrastructure do we want to build the future of finance? Since the space ripens and the edges to integrate with global financial systems, the urgency of this issue is merely amplified.
In 2025, this decision is no longer purely technical. It is a competition between two visions: a modular, decentralization magazine Ethereum and a high -performance monolithic approach Solana. The result will help to determine what the next phase of finance based on blockchain-and to shape the architecture of tomorrow’s global financial systems.
In this article, I share my view of how both networks are building in the future and which are likely to appear in the long run.
Ethereum: the basis of serious definitions
Ethereum It is more than just blockchain – it is the subsoil of a modern defi. It is a place where they can secure, composible applications and build a long -term financial infrastructure. Institutional players turn to Ethereum when they want to tokenize assets and capital flows here for safety. The fact that More than 55% The total value of the locked (TVL) across the main chains is the Ethereum, which indicates its dominance.
Unlike SolanEthereum with universal layers of 1 size takes place modular scaling. Layer 1 remains the basis of the core, while the layer 2 processes a specific workload, such as micro-tranak or gaming, avoiding overload in the main chain. This structure preserves decentralization while allowing a scale. With the introduction of proto-dankharding at the beginning of 2025, the transaction costs of the layer 2 significantly reduced-Ethereum management in modular architecture.
This means that the Ethereum model has compromises. Her reliance on layer 2 can introduce fragmentation. Some defined primitives must live on layer 1 for a full component. While isolated applications, such as book books, can work on L2S, these solutions often feel like a temporary repair, not a long -term design. The actually integrated defi requires synchronous compositions on the chain-or-what works best when everything works in the same base layer.
However, the greatest force of the Ethereum is its uncompromising commitment to decentralization. It is one of the most politically neutral blockchains – a key feature in an increasingly regulated environment. Speed and user experience can be optimized over time, but decentralization is the principle of establishment. Once compromised, it is almost impossible to restore it.
The development experience is another edge. Writing intelligent Ethereum contracts is significantly simpler than on the sole, which allows developers to produce a secure and well tested code. This maturity is part of the reason why Ethereum developers are comfortable, making contracts unchanged – confidence in security. It is no coincidence that almost every significant innovation of the defi originated on Ethereum. With more than 1,388 deployed protocols compared to 232 Solana, numbers to speak for yourself.
When the security, composition and trust of the developers are balanced, it strengthens the whole ecosystem.
Solana: Fast and Effective but Centralized
Solana deals with the same challenge of scaling from a different angle. Its monolithic architecture maintains everything on one layer 1. This offers tangible benefits: extremely fast transactions, low fees and trouble -free user experience.
Solana is convincing from raw performance –capable Processing 3 000-4,000 transactions per second (TPS) today, with expectation of reaching over 1 million TPS via coming Validator Firedancer. These numbers, based on the testnet results, are impressive compared to the Ethereum diameter compared to the diameter of 15-30 TP.
However, this performance comes with compromises. Solana design includes a node of a leader who sequence of transactions sequences. Although it improves permeability, it represents centralization risks. The network is distributed but is not really decentralized. This distinction depends – especially in a world where institutions prefer political neutrality and censorship resistance.
Yet not every case of use requires deep decentralization. For example, internal CBDC or consumer -oriented applications in the field of games and fintech may benefit from the throughput and UX Solana. I would not be surprised if we saw the state -adapted version of Solan deployed in a controlled environment.
Yet despite Solan’s dynamics, Ethereum remains a choice of choice for what I say “serious money”.
Structural sound vs. adoption
The main debate about definitions in 2025 – and for – and for – what should be optimized for the industry: structural integrity or mass acceptance? Should we build durable, decentralized and composible systems, although they are slower and more complex? Or do they prefer scale and UX at the expense of basic crypto values?
The persecution of adoption without structural sounds is short -sighted. If the protocols compromise security or decentralization, the regulators inevitably deposit the same limitations that burden traditional finances. At this point, the promise of defi would be lost.
Therefore, institutional capital continues to prefer Ethereum – and why I think the preference will apply. Neutrality and safety cannot be equipped with equipment; From the beginning, it must be built into the base layer.
If we want it to define the definstasting of the hype of hype and create the backbone of the new global financial rules, the Ethereum offers the most robust way forward. It provides us with the best shot in the construction of financial rails that are durable, safe and impossible.
