Did Michael Saylor Rebut a Controversial Bitcoin Proposal? It’s Complicated



Briefly

  • The strategy Michael Saylor seems to support Bitcoin knots on X on Wednesday.
  • Executive director of a reputable company suspects Saylor’s intention.
  • Saylor acknowledged the discussion about Op_return somewhere else.

When Michael Saylor speaks, Bitcoiners often listen. But on Thursday, they could not agree on whether the co -founder and the executive chairman of the strategy had intended a controversial change in Bitcoin’s base of the codes that shared the community in recent months.

On Wednesday, Saylor crowded A stylized video on the X who speaks on Peter McCormack. AND episodewho made his debut more than a year ago, he showed his thoughts on how changes in the Bitcoin protocol could potentially lead to unintentional and negative consequences.

The 10-minute clip published by Saylor included an invitation to the action at the very end, which Saylor never publicly announced publicly. The video encouraged users to “start knots”, the form of software for Bitcoin Noda operators, which are flutating changes set for its prevailing alternative.

Bitcoin Core Currently makes 70% of machines that confirm Bitcoin transactions, according to data from Clark Moody Bitcoin. And the Bitcoin Core V30, which should be published next month, is expected to modify how the so -called Bitcoin Opcode can be used. After months of debate, Bitcoin Core developers committed to a change in June.

Bitcoin opcodes are predefined functions that form the foundation of the Bitcoin code basin, and op_return enables people to store data in transactions. In Bitcoin Core V30, the amount of data that can be stored via the op_returni is set to an increase in 100,000 bytes with 80 bytes.

Proponents claim that the shift will unlock more complex apps on Bitcoin, at the same time setting up current solutions of obsolete. Critics claim that this could result in a more congested network or even stimulate the storage of problematic or illegal conflicts on the Bitcoin network.

The Bitcoin Knots supporters immediately portrayed Saylor’s social media activity as evidence of his support, but Saylor has yet to clarify his attitude, and some suspicion that the message was intentional.

In some way, discussion about the general echoes polemics surrounding ordinals. As the property similar to NFT gained (temporary) popularity in 2023, Some cheered Development as an innovative, while others claimed that Bitcoin should stick to their monetary focus.

“If you believe the government should make a minimum to control your life, you [should] Believe that the protocol should make a minimum, “Saylor said in the video he posted on Wednesday.

At the gathering of companies buying Bitcoin in New York earlier this month, Saylor commented that they echoed that conservative feeling, according to a video Posted on the X on an account that passes to Señor 11s about a week ago.

“I think this discussion we currently see is via Op_return limit, this is actually a second red or maybe even a third -order change,” Saylor said. “But the reaction of the community, which is to dismiss, an inflammatory reaction, I thought it was a healthy answer.”

To be sure, Saylor publicly does not publicly appear in favor of Bitcoin Core or Bitcoin Node. In 2023. Saylor said Decipher If the discussion around the office was important because it could help miners in the long run or strengthen the adoption of bitcoin.

On Wednesday, several accounts He hired a clarification from Saylor to X, asking the questions whether the influential executive director watched the clip he re -set to the end. The message of Pro-man is shown exactly three seconds.

Decipher addressed the comment strategy.

Executive director of a prominent financial service company, who asked anonymity to talk about controversy, he said Decipher That Saylor was sure that he would not re-set the clip that he knew that at the end of the clip was included a message about pro-pursuers.

“He would never deal with something like that,” they said, claiming that Saylor was in a relationship now, because the descent of fasting would also look like he was taking the side.

Even if Saylor inadvertently published a message of the Pro-man, an individual said one thing seemed safe: “The sides are becoming more vicious.”

Daily review Bulletin

Start every day with top news, plus original features, podcast, videos and more.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *