Fragmented liquidity is DeFi’s central scalability risk.

Opinions: Hart Lambur, co -founder of risk laboratories.

Decentralized finances, or deficit, are built on the composition, but the complication breaks. Once new chains are prolonged, fragments of liquidity and incentives weaken.

What was once the only shared environment was shattered with dozens of markets with silence. Defense It is not dead, but without the infrastructure that connects this environment, it can lose what was powerful.

Broken liquidity becomes the risk of defi to central scalability. While the expansion to multiple chains was a natural response to Ethereum scalability limits, it created a new class of problems.

Infrastructure, not ideology, will determine whether Multichiain strengthens the future or weakens the category.

Fragmented liquidity is a defia failure regime

Defo protocols rely on deep, comprehensive liquidity: shared assets of asset that can be borrowed, replaced and layered into strategies.

However, this assumption is no longer valid in a world with multiple shortcomings. Liquidity is now spreading tens of L1, Rollups and Appchains. Aave is deployed on 17 chains; Pendle 11.

These deployments are strong in themselves, but the liquidity they capture is specific to the chain and often inaccessible outside the environment where it is stored.

This fragmentation It creates basic inefficiency: thinner markets, higher slip and weaker incentives of users and protocols. Even the best designed economic models are beginning to decompose when the liquidity on which it depends is no longer dense. The protocols that function smoothly on the Ethereum Mainnet are now trying to bring the same results elsewhere – not because their models are wrong, but because the context in which they operate has changed.

A shift to Multichiain was necessary for the scale. But without a way to imitate compositions across the chains, it risk undermining the foundations of defi’s success itself.

Multichain ux friction is not a root problem

Most of the attention in Multichain Defi was focused on the friction of UX: switching wallets, obtaining gas tokens and jumping via UIS Bridge (user interface). These are symptoms at the surface level of a deeper problem: lack of unified layer design.

Users who try to make a basic Crosschain Actions often encounter inconsistent interfaces, fragmented prices and uncertain results. In recent months, there has been some progress with SWAP-and-point solutions, but fragmentation of liquidity and directing inefficiency persists.

Most of these systems rely on isolated chain liquidity funds, duplicate incentives and limited routing paths. Although the front-end feels united, the rear part remains fragmented-the capital inefficient and difficult to fold.

If liquidity cannot easily move across the chain or composition of strategies, it requires bridging, packaging or interaction with multiple applications, then the Defi cannot scale meaningfully. The solvers imitate synchronization, so users do not have to.

Related: Polygons supported, highly profitable blockchain katana states institutional adoption

Blockchains are not designed to work in synchronization. There is no native way to perform a single atomic action across the chains. We do not have to wait for synchronous infrastructure. We can imitate it.

This is where the solvers come. The solvers are sophisticated actors who use their own capital and logic to connect to fragmented actions on behalf of the user. The user simply expresses the intention – swap, deposit, interacts – and the solver performs across the chains to fill it, and abstract the complexity under it.

The intention -based infrastructure solves for interoperability, not consolidation

The intentions are more than just an abstraction layer: they move it how we propose liquidity, composite and implementation.

ERC-7683 It standardizes how these Crosschain intentions are expressed and fulfilled. It allows invisible bridging: swaps, deposits or interactions with one click that moves across the chains without the user needing to handle complexity-dokonce among ecosystems that have not been designed for interoperation.

The user on the sole can be replaced into the vault on the arbitrator. Liquidity can move to and out of BNB stringHistorically silenced from Ethereum-Rodová standards. Strategies become portable. The protocols become interoperable.

The result is not perfect uniformity, but something more resistant: systems that work despite their differences.

Instead of forceing each string to adopt the same standards, users allow users to define results, while the solvers perform across ecosystems – they maintain local strengths while allowing global liquidity. They do not consider the complexity of Multichiin. They will pass by.

Multichain is no longer theoretical. It is an environment in which defi works today. If we do not solve the folding in the infrastructure layer, the defi does not have to be scaled with it.

The risk is not a dramatic collapse. It is slow erosion: thinner liquidity, weaker incentives and fewer things that work across the chains.

Infrastructure Solver offers a way out – not forcing uniformity, but by imitating the experience of synchronization across fragmented chains. This is how we keep what defi power in the first place and how to unlock what will come next.

Opinions: Hart Lambur, co -founder of risk laboratories.

This article is for general information purposes and is not intended and should not be considered legal or investment advice. The opinions, ideas and opinions expressed here are the author himself and do not necessarily reflect or present the opinions and opinions of Caintelegraph.