LinkedIn Updates ‘Top Voice’ Badge Requirements

After being abolished Golden Badge “Upper Voice” who were related to contributions to the collaborative articles last September, LinkedIdin has now introduced an update to the ITS Top Voice Blue Badge programto ensure that its assigned members remain active in the application.

Now, when a member of the “top -notch voice” in the application is assigned a member, they will only keep it six months old, with LinkedIn to regularly review the distribution of badge. So far, the upper voices of the blue ejected have retained their badge for an indefinite period of time.

As explained LinkedIn::

“The best voices are evaluated twice a year. Once a member has been called to the Top Voices program, they will remain a top vote for at least six months and meet the conditions for renovation of the badge as long as they continue to meet basic programs. “

These requirements:

• Create consistent content and regular engagement with the community.
• High quality contributions, with originality and authenticity in voice and style.
• Insights divided about professional topics, which may include news, comments and analysis relevant to a particular industry, a company or a local economy.
• Profiles, content and interactions on platforms remain Policy of the LinkedIn Professional Community

So, how to get a badge “top -notch voice”?

Well, as noted, LinkedIn tried to provide users with an alternative, automated way to get recognition in the application, adding golden significance of “top votes” that are arranged on the basis of how many articles on cooperation are contributing.

The articles in collaboration are questions generated on AI, which are then submitted to LinkedIn users to their contribution. An increase in contributing to such a badge was that could help your profile highlight, however LinkedIn revealed that too many non-Ekkupr was cheating on the system and gaining these badges without the necessary knowledge or experience.

So they got rid of them, but his blue badge “upper voice”, which was awarded by Linkedin’s editors who were in the house, remained:

To get them, you must comply with the above requirements and you hope that Linkedin’s editorial team will notice you.

So, it is more like checking the past on Twitter, where it is actually harder and requires a human examination, unlike an automated process.

The better the means of ensuring high quality participants, but it also means that you probably won’t get it unless you really focus on Linkedin posting and share your expertise in the application.

Generally, changes in LinkedIn’s singles of “top -notch votes” are positive, which will ensure better representation of expertise and skills, although it may also be annoyed by some people who want to get recognized in the application.

You cannot buy your way to authority here, which means that the only path is up to publish and share real insights.