Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Briefly
- Polymarket market of $ 237 million on Zelenskyy’s clothing opted for “no” despite the wide visual and media claims that he wore a suit.
- Oracle cited the disadvantage of the “credible consensus of reporting” in his judgment on July 1, causing a return reaction and allegations of inconsistencies.
- Critics claim that voting has been weighted to manipulate the outcome, while proposals for the community reforms were rejected.
The high polymal market agreement asking if Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy will wear a suit before July is closed by the final resolution “No” on Tuesday night, despite widespread media reporting and pictures that suggest otherwise.
The last review on Tuesday followed after a series of disputes, starting with the challenge of the initial outcome of the “Yes”. This result was later canceled in favor of “no” after the second examination, before it was completed.
The latter outcome of “NO” has launched a return reaction of users and commentators in the crypto circles, ruling concern about market management, resolution standards, and the role of voting on tokens in decentralized protocols.
The market, which attracted more than $ 237 million In the volume of trading, he was among the most active Polymarket this year. He asked if Zelenskyy would be “photographed or taken in a suit” between March 22 and June 30.
The decentralized Oracle system operated by the mind was responsible for the outcome judgment, which relied on the “consensus of credible reporting”.
June 24, Zelenskyy appeared on NATO event in the Netherlands, wearing a black jacket, appropriate pants and a collar shirt, clothing described by many media as a suit.
Yet July 1, the mind ruled that the reporting consensus was not sufficiently established and completed the outcome as “No.”
The decision encouraged charges of inconsistency, and critics were allegations before Media reports and visual evidence. Others claimed that rejection was “based” based on a precedent from a similar market in May, where it was also thought that almost identical clothes were insufficient to fill in criteria.
Live broadcasting controversial figures Martin Shkli on July 1 added fuel controversy, calling the resolution procedure “fraud“And arguing that they will cause concern with one of the main investors Polymarket.
On the same day, the community proposals that persuade Polymarket to reconsider the decision or forms a team for integrity were formally rejecteddespite each receiving hundreds of stitches.
More than 40 global media titles related to clothing as a suit since then made by users who are committed to reviewing the decision.
Several prominent cryptocurrencies commentators,, journalistsAnd the associates of the protocol have publicly questioned the integrity of the judgment, noting the potential to affect the doctrine of the token the outcomes of the UMA, not a unique consensus.
Polymarket did not indicate plans to re -visit the decision. The platform did not immediately respond Decipherptic Request for comment.
Daily review Bulletin
Start every day with top news, plus original features, podcast, videos and more.
