Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Key with you:
- The IMF Bo Li said that the regulatory uncertainty around stablekoin persists, especially in terms of classification and recovery.
- Global financial authorities work to match frames, but remain in the early stages.
- Political inconsistencies can drive companies towards jurisdictions with less supervision.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) continues to indicate regulatory uncertainty StablecoinAccording to notes representatives of the CEO Bo Li during Summer Davos 2025 June 25.
As stable, while stablecoins are gaining traction in global financing, two classification problems remain upset: whether stablecoins should be treated as currencies or financial assets, and if they are considered a currency at what level of money falls like M0 or M2.
Stablecoin’s key challenges and classification
“But this is just a starting point. Many questions remain unresolved and the stronger global consensus must still be created,” he said.
Li added that several jurisdictions, including the US, Europe and more countries in Asia, are conducting political experiments. However, he described and called for the current phase to make the international regulatory bodies.
The IMF He cooperates with entities such as the Council for Financial Stability and the Basel Committee to provide instructions. If she said that many Member States proceed cautiously, especially those that use stablecoins to expand financial integration.
In addition to the classification Li, he raised concerns about promotion. Without unified standards, national rules can conflict, complicate adherence to global operators and increase the risk of regulatory gaps.
No timeline was provided where these framework could be closed, but if the ongoing dialogue between regulators, central banks and financial institutions were acknowledged.
Regulatory gaps can drive companies to looser jurisdictions
Thanks to the increased global interest in the central bank digital currency and projects in the private sector, regulatory clarity can shape how these technologies are used in cross -border payments and domestic services.
If he repeated that technology will affect the structure of the global currency system over time, although he warned against the expectations of fast transitions.
As stablecoins are ultimately classified, it can affect how central banks control liquidity and propose monetary policy. Treatment of their part of money would require new tools for monitoring and checking their impact on the wider economy.
Private companies developing Stablecoin infrastructure are also waiting for clearer rules. Without a regulatory settlement, some may move operations to free -surveillance jurisdictions, while others delay integration with traditional financial systems until legal boundaries are defined.
Frequently asked questions (FAQ)
Are the decentralized stablecoins in regulatory discussions treated differently?
Stablecoins issued by DAO or without clear corporate support often do not fall outside the current legal framework and raise questions about responsibility, reserves and recovery.
Could inconsistent regulation lead to “regulatory arbitration” of digital assets?
Companies can establish operations in regions with mild rules, create uneven competition and potentially undermine a more robust regulatory environment.
Do tax authorities have Stablecoin policy?
In many jurisdictions, the tax treatment of stablecoin transactions, especially those used for daily payments, is still upset and complicates both individual compliance and institutional accounting.
Contribution Stablecoin regulation still faces key unresolved questions, IMF says He appeared for the first time Cryptonews.
